nanog mailing list archives
Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN?
From: John Fraizer <nanog () EnterZone Net>
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2000 13:27:04 -0500 (EST)
On Fri, 29 Dec 2000, Andrew Brown wrote:
Oh, you're quite right. So, the moral of this story is: If you want your network to look right and act right, don't use 1918 space on your routers.it's not my network i'm whining about...it's bt. oh well. whatever. grr...grumble...mumble...
Andrew, It wasn't my intention to insult you. I was aware of the fact that it was BT's network (or a client of theirs). It was just a general comment. --- John Fraizer EnterZone, Inc
Current thread:
- RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? Miguel A.L. Paraz (Dec 28)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? Sean Donelan (Dec 28)
- Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? Andrew Brown (Dec 29)
- Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? John Fraizer (Dec 29)
- Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? Andrew Brown (Dec 29)
- Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? John Fraizer (Dec 29)
- Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? Andrew Brown (Dec 29)
- Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? John Fraizer (Dec 29)
- Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? Andrew Brown (Dec 29)
- Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? Andrew Brown (Dec 29)
- Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? Daniel L. Golding (Dec 29)
- Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? Andrew Brown (Dec 29)
- Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? Simon Lyall (Dec 29)
- RE: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? Deron J. Ringen (Dec 29)
- RE: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? John Fraizer (Dec 29)
- Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? Geoffrey Zinderdine (Dec 29)
- Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? Bill Fumerola (Dec 30)
- RE: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? Randy Bush (Dec 31)
- RE: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? Derek J. Balling (Dec 31)