nanog mailing list archives
RE: Where are ATM NAPs going?
From: Bill Woodcock <woody () zocalo net>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 01:08:55 -0800 (PST)
> If I have this correctly; You are saying that ATM is neither > cost-effective or cost-competitive with Gig-E? Correct. I don't see a whole heck of a lot of ATM switches at $500/gigabit. -Bill
Current thread:
- Re: Where are ATM NAPs going?, (continued)
- Re: Where are ATM NAPs going? John Fraizer (Dec 18)
- Re: Where are ATM NAPs going? Leo Bicknell (Dec 18)
- Re: Where are ATM NAPs going? John Fraizer (Dec 18)
- Re: Where are ATM NAPs going? Sean Donelan (Dec 18)
- Re: Where are ATM NAPs going? Marshall Eubanks (Dec 18)
- Re: Where are ATM NAPs going? Richard A. Steenbergen (Dec 18)
- Re: Where are ATM NAPs going? John Fraizer (Dec 19)
- Re: Where are ATM NAPs going? Omachonu Ogali (Dec 19)
- Re: Where are ATM NAPs going? John Fraizer (Dec 19)
- Re: Where are ATM NAPs going? Shawn McMahon (Dec 19)
- Re: Where are ATM NAPs going? John Fraizer (Dec 19)
- RE: Where are ATM NAPs going? Roeland Meyer (Dec 19)
- RE: Where are ATM NAPs going? Bill Woodcock (Dec 19)
- Re: Where are ATM NAPs going? Richard A. Steenbergen (Dec 19)