nanog mailing list archives
RE: Where are ATM NAPs going?
From: Roeland Meyer <rmeyer () mhsc com>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 00:48:54 -0800
So, should CMH-IX go ATM? Well, given the traffic levels I don't think you could collect enough in fees to pay for an ATM switch. On that basis, ATM is a poor choice. Again, it's a poor choice not because of the technology, but because of the price points and products available. -- Leo Bicknell - bicknell () ufp org Systems Engineer - Internetworking Engineer - CCIE 3440 Read TMBG List - tmbg-list-request () tmbg org, www.tmbg.org
If I have this correctly; You are saying that ATM is neither cost-effective or cost-competitive with Gig-E?
Current thread:
- Re: Where are ATM NAPs going?, (continued)
- Re: Where are ATM NAPs going? Stephen Sprunk (Dec 19)
- Re: Where are ATM NAPs going? John Fraizer (Dec 18)
- Re: Where are ATM NAPs going? Leo Bicknell (Dec 18)
- Re: Where are ATM NAPs going? Sean Donelan (Dec 18)
- Re: Where are ATM NAPs going? Marshall Eubanks (Dec 18)
- Re: Where are ATM NAPs going? Richard A. Steenbergen (Dec 18)
- Re: Where are ATM NAPs going? John Fraizer (Dec 19)
- Re: Where are ATM NAPs going? Omachonu Ogali (Dec 19)
- Re: Where are ATM NAPs going? John Fraizer (Dec 19)
- Re: Where are ATM NAPs going? Shawn McMahon (Dec 19)
- Re: Where are ATM NAPs going? John Fraizer (Dec 19)
- RE: Where are ATM NAPs going? Roeland Meyer (Dec 19)
- RE: Where are ATM NAPs going? Bill Woodcock (Dec 19)
- Re: Where are ATM NAPs going? Richard A. Steenbergen (Dec 19)