nanog mailing list archives
Re: ARIN Policy on IP-based Web Hosting
From: Shawn McMahon <smcmahon () eiv com>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2000 20:49:48 -0400
On Thu, Aug 31, 2000 at 03:18:27PM -0700, Jon Mansey wrote:
Erm, I thought napster worked OK through NAT...
Not if both sides are using NAT. And, since what we're talking about here is getting EVERYBODY to use it, it thus stands to reason that this would be the case. NAT is a kludge. IP was made to use addresses, anything else is a kludge and always will be.
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: ARIN Policy on IP-based Web Hosting, (continued)
- Re: ARIN Policy on IP-based Web Hosting Dana Hudes (Aug 31)
- Re: ARIN Policy on IP-based Web Hosting Patrick Evans (Aug 31)
- Re: ARIN Policy on IP-based Web Hosting Deepak Jain (Aug 31)
- Re: ARIN Policy on IP-based Web Hosting Edward S. Marshall (Aug 31)
- Re: ARIN Policy on IP-based Web Hosting Shawn McMahon (Aug 31)
- Re: ARIN Policy on IP-based Web Hosting Deepak Jain (Aug 31)
- Re: ARIN Policy on IP-based Web Hosting Shawn McMahon (Aug 31)
- RE: ARIN Policy on IP-based Web Hosting Christian Kuhtz (Aug 31)
- Re: ARIN Policy on IP-based Web Hosting John Fraizer (Aug 31)
- Re: ARIN Policy on IP-based Web Hosting Jon Mansey (Aug 31)
- Re: ARIN Policy on IP-based Web Hosting Shawn McMahon (Aug 31)
- Re: ARIN Policy on IP-based Web Hosting Alec H. Peterson (Aug 31)
- Re: ARIN Policy on IP-based Web Hosting Patrick Greenwell (Aug 31)
- Re: ARIN Policy on IP-based Web Hosting Alec H. Peterson (Aug 31)
- RE: ARIN Policy on IP-based Web Hosting Christian Kuhtz (Aug 31)
- Re: ARIN Policy on IP-based Web Hosting Alec H. Peterson (Aug 31)