nanog mailing list archives
Re: Formal study: How many points networks share
From: "J. Scott Marcus" <smarcus () genuity com>
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2000 20:46:14 -0400
At 17:32 08/28/2000 -0700, Sean Donelan wrote:
After the wave of mergers, attempted mergers, unmergers, and all the related investigations by the EU and DOJ; I think most of the providers know how to give each other notice by now :-) ....
Unfortunately, Sean, your conclusion may not follow. Responding to compulsory legal process is significantly easier than providing equivalent information on a mutual, voluntary basis. And voluntarism won't necessarily produce a complete set of responses from all major providers.
Current thread:
- Formal study: How many points networks share Sean Donelan (Aug 26)
- Re: Formal study: How many points networks share Randy Bush (Aug 26)
- Re: Formal study: How many points networks share Jonathon Plonka (Aug 26)
- Re: Formal study: How many points networks share Scott Marcus (Aug 27)
- Re: Formal study: How many points networks share Randy Bush (Aug 27)
- Re: Formal study: How many points networks share batz (Aug 28)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Formal study: How many points networks share Sean Donelan (Aug 28)
- Re: Formal study: How many points networks share Sean Donelan (Aug 28)
- Re: Formal study: How many points networks share Randy Bush (Aug 28)
- Re: Formal study: How many points networks share J. Scott Marcus (Aug 28)
- Re: Formal study: How many points networks share John Fraizer (Aug 28)
- Re: Formal study: How many points networks share ken lindahl (Aug 28)
- Re: Formal study: How many points networks share Randy Bush (Aug 28)
- Re: Formal study: How many points networks share Randy Bush (Aug 26)