nanog mailing list archives

Re: Community NO-EXPORT


From: "Yu Ning" <yuning () ns chinanet cn net>
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 09:54:57 +0800

Hi Haas,

Danny's reply is clear and right! I just want a little supplement.
While full mesh IBGP in the transit backbone eliminate the need for
synchronization, we usually flood all the IBGP/EBGP routers their
next-hop via IGP. So you needn't worry about synchronization of the 
next-hops, but their reachibility.

regards,

------------------------------------------------------
(Mr.) Yu(2) Ning(2)
Int'l/Domestic Routing/Resource Man.
ChinaNET(AS4134) Backbone Operation Center
Networking Dep.,Datacom Bureau, China Telecom.
------------------------------------------------------
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Danny McPherson" <danny () tcb net>
To: <nanog () merit edu>
Sent: Friday, August 25, 2000 5:55 AM
Subject: Re: Community NO-EXPORT 




No, BGP synchronization does indeed refer to the 
requirement that the destination network be available
via the IGP.  

If it were just the BGP NEXT_HOP value it wouldn't be 
of much use, as intermediate nodes perform forwarding 
based on the DA in the packet and [if not synchronized] 
won't find a match.  As a result, the packet will be 
discarded.

Of course, most folks simply have full mesh IBGP 
(perhaps via RR or confeds) and so there's no reason
too enable [or not disable] BGP synchronization. 

-danny

Color me confused, but isn't the synchronization waiting on the 
NEXT_HOPs showing up in your IGP, not the actual BGP route?

After all, the issue is this:

BR-A - (your internal network) - BR-B

A route shows up at BR-A with a nexthop of some interface on BR-A
(or the loopback interface of BR-A).  It is then propogated via
iBGP to BR-B.

It is only unsafe to install said route and propogate it BR-B's peers
if the route's nexthop is not reachable by BR-B.

This is a far cry from having to inject your BGP into your IGP.

I will note that this isn't how Cisco has it documented, and I don't know
how they actually treat the sync issue.  The documentation actually
says it does wait for the route to show up in the IGP.





Current thread: