Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus

[Garlic <garlic () garlic com>]

Why you dragging me into this :-)  We have no business relationship with
Mr. Cook!

Ehud Gavron wrote:

> This argument is specious.  Gordon isn't press.  Well, garlic press
> maybe.
>
> Ehud
> p.s. "press credentials" are not hard to fake, but ask Gordon for his
>
> > On Mon, 03 Apr 2000 21:47:50 -0400  Paul Ferguson wrote:
> > > > surprised not to see this mentioned on NANOG
> > > >
> > > > > Sent:  Friday, March 31, 2000
> > > > > To:    Notify
> > > > > Subject:       Exodus Customer Confidential Communication
> > >
> > > Gordon,
> > >
> > > Does the word "confidential" elude you?
> > >
> > > - paul
>
> > Golly Paul, I would not have guessed you would have taken this
> > position.
>
> > If a tobacco company marks a collusion document "CONFIDENTIAL", should
> > the press not report it?
>
> > If a Waco report is market "Top Secret", should the press not report
> > it?
>
> > If Boeing has a flawed design, should the press not report it?
>
> > There is a fair amount of evidence that an unruly and discourteous
> > press is a profound good for society....
>
> > regards,
> > fletcher
> > P.S.  "Scandal-Monger", Safire, William, 2000