Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus

[Adrian Chadd <adrian () creative net au>]

On Tue, Apr 04, 2000, John Payne wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 04, 2000 at 12:15:24AM -0400, Gordon Cook wrote:
> > else.  My default mode of operation has always been to keep the 
> > identity of the leaker CONFIDENTIAL.  It is a subject of interest to 
>
> So publishing the leaked note verbatim doesn't strike you as possibly
> disclosing the identity of the leaker to the company that had it leaked?
>
> It seems to me that it would be trivia for exodus or any other company
> to insert uniquely identifying phrases or misspellings, or whatever...

Its the leaker's risk.





Adrian