nanog mailing list archives

Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus


From: John Payne <john+nanog () flea ibm net>
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2000 23:28:09 +0100


On Tue, Apr 04, 2000 at 12:15:24AM -0400, Gordon Cook wrote:
else.  My default mode of operation has always been to keep the 
identity of the leaker CONFIDENTIAL.  It is a subject of interest to 

So publishing the leaked note verbatim doesn't strike you as possibly
disclosing the identity of the leaker to the company that had it leaked?

It seems to me that it would be trivia for exodus or any other company
to insert uniquely identifying phrases or misspellings, or whatever...

-- 
John Payne                              jcapayne () att com
OpenNet Infrastructure Team, AT&T Global Network Services 
Mailpt C2E, c/o IBM North Harbour, PO Box 41 Portsmouth, PO6 3AU
Tel - +44 (0)23 9256 1977, Fax - 23 9221 0543




Current thread: