nanog mailing list archives
Re: Peering Table Question
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2000 15:19:43 -0700
Errr, isn't 'settlement based peering' synonomous with 'usage-based transit' ?
not exactly. you get less routes and your routes do not propagate as far. hence, sometimes it is cheaper per megabit than normal transit. sometimes paid pseudo-peering is nice because, as the payee is really a customer, one does not have to be as formal about consistent application of peering qualifications as one does for true peering, when one has to presume that some day one will be explaining equitable treatment to the doj, ec, ... randy
Current thread:
- Re: Peering Table Question, (continued)
- Re: Peering Table Question Jeff Haas (Apr 19)
- Re: Peering Table Question Jeff Barrows (Apr 19)
- Re: Peering Table Question Alex Bligh (Apr 19)
- Re: Peering Table Question Randy Bush (Apr 19)
- Re: Peering Table Question Christian Nielsen (Apr 19)
- Re: Peering Table Question Randy Bush (Apr 19)
- Re: Peering Table Question Joel Jaeggli (Apr 19)
- Re: Peering Table Question Simon Lockhart (Apr 19)
- Re: Peering Table Question I Am Not An Isp (Apr 19)
- Re: Peering Table Question Alex Rubenstein (Apr 19)
- Re: Peering Table Question Randy Bush (Apr 19)
- Re: Peering Table Question Mark Kent (Apr 19)
- Re: Peering Table Question Alex Rubenstein (Apr 19)
- Re: Peering Table Question Steve Meuse (Apr 19)
- Re: Peering Table Question John Fraizer (Apr 19)
- Re: Peering Table Question Forrest W. Christian (Apr 20)
- Message not available
- Re: Peering Table Question I Am Not An Isp (Apr 20)
- Re: Peering Table Question Forrest W. Christian (Apr 20)
- Re: Peering Table Question Brandon Ross (Apr 20)
- Message not available
- Re: Peering Table Question I Am Not An Isp (Apr 20)
- Re: Peering Table Question Mark Borchers (Apr 21)