nanog mailing list archives
Re: Peering Table Question
From: Christian Nielsen <cnielsen () nielsen net>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2000 13:28:19 -0600 (MDT)
On Wed, 19 Apr 2000, Randy Bush wrote:
To further complicate matters, many networks out there are mis-representing themselves as [cost-free-] peering with other networks when they are actually customers, or in some type of 'settlement' arrangement.i contend that one can count the true tier one networks on the fingers of two hands.
is a network tier one if they have settlement based peering? or is it just a network that sees no transit routes from any one company? christian
Current thread:
- Peering Table Question Jeff Lentz (Apr 19)
- Re: Peering Table Question bmanning (Apr 19)
- Re: Peering Table Question Mike Hughes (Apr 19)
- Re: Peering Table Question Peter Galbavy (Apr 19)
- Re: Peering Table Question Mike Hughes (Apr 19)
- Re: Peering Table Question Jeff Haas (Apr 19)
- Re: Peering Table Question Peter Galbavy (Apr 19)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Peering Table Question Jeff Barrows (Apr 19)
- Re: Peering Table Question Alex Bligh (Apr 19)
- Re: Peering Table Question Randy Bush (Apr 19)
- Re: Peering Table Question Christian Nielsen (Apr 19)
- Re: Peering Table Question Randy Bush (Apr 19)
- Re: Peering Table Question Joel Jaeggli (Apr 19)
- Re: Peering Table Question Simon Lockhart (Apr 19)
- Re: Peering Table Question I Am Not An Isp (Apr 19)
- Re: Peering Table Question Alex Rubenstein (Apr 19)
- Re: Peering Table Question Randy Bush (Apr 19)
- Re: Peering Table Question Mark Kent (Apr 19)
- Re: Peering Table Question Alex Rubenstein (Apr 19)
- Re: Peering Table Question Steve Meuse (Apr 19)
- Re: Peering Table Question John Fraizer (Apr 19)