nanog mailing list archives
Re: your mail
From: "Alex P. Rudnev" <alex () Relcom EU net>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 1999 14:37:46 +0400 (MSD)
Get IOS FireWall Feauture set, router with the 2 LAN and 2 WAN interfaces, and say _get away_ to the hw vendors. No doubt, it's possible to enter into IOS if you did not installed access lists on the VTY, keep working some extra services (such as router-based WWW) or so on; but it do not depend of the firewalls at all... And - if you don't need session-level firewall (with the analysing of SMTP content for example) IOS FW feature set is very effective solution. On 21 Sep 1999, Gerry McDonald wrote:
Date: 21 Sep 99 11:13:08 -0500 From: Gerry McDonald <gerry () injectronics com> To: nanog () merit edu I have a question... I am currently expanding our network to accommodate a T1 to the Internet and a 512K frame connection to our WAN.. I need to purchase a router and spoke to several vendors. I have heard conflicting stories regarding the model of Cisco router I should get. One vendor <vendor a> tells me that I should get a 2620 with 2 Wan Ports and the other vendor <vendor b> is telling me that I might compromise my security by using one router for WAN and Internet connections. Their suggesting that I get 2 routers one for my Wan and another for the Internet connection... Vendor B is telling me that it would be possible to enter our wan without touching our firewall should someone be able to hack into our IOS on the router... I decided to go the experts... I would appreciate any helpful suggestions. Thanks... -Gerry
Aleksei Roudnev, Network Operations Center, Relcom, Moscow (+7 095) 194-19-95 (Network Operations Center Hot Line),(+7 095) 230-41-41, N 13729 (pager) (+7 095) 196-72-12 (Support), (+7 095) 194-33-28 (Fax)
Current thread:
- [no subject] Gerry McDonald (Sep 21)
- RE: Roeland M.J. Meyer (Sep 21)
- RE: Mike Leber (Sep 22)
- RE: Derek Balling (Sep 22)
- NANOG applicability (was: RE: ) dave o'leary (Sep 23)
- Re: NANOG applicability (was: RE: ) Majdi Abbas (Sep 23)
- Re: NANOG applicability (was: RE: ) john heasley (Sep 23)
- Re: NANOG applicability (was: RE: ) Sean Butler (Sep 23)
- RE: Mike Leber (Sep 22)
- RE: Roeland M.J. Meyer (Sep 21)
- Re: your mail Stephen Sprunk (Sep 22)
- Re: your mail Alex P. Rudnev (Sep 22)
- Re: your mail Alex P. Rudnev (Sep 22)