nanog mailing list archives
Re: The Return of RP Records?
From: Jeff <jeff () tcnet org>
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 1999 13:55:47 -0500 (EST)
On Sun, 14 Mar 1999, Jared Mauch wrote:
(jump to end, POC info is still in whois)
Aha. As I had stated, the removal was only "somewhat confirmed". Perhaps I was a bit premature in my thoughts. :)
Yes, POC of information in dns, soa records, etc.. is useful. Problem is severe lack of clue with people running dns. This can not be easily fixed.
Indeed. That is why Whois is so useful. It more-or-less requires that each domain have contact information in a proper form, etc. I'm not sure how I feel about the Clueless NIC leading the Clueless users, though... -jeff Jeff Godin Network Specialist Traverse Area District Library / Traverse Community Network jeff () tcnet org - 616/932-8546 voice
Current thread:
- The Return of RP Records? Jeff (Mar 14)
- Re: The Return of RP Records? Jared Mauch (Mar 14)
- Re: The Return of RP Records? Jeff (Mar 14)
- Message not available
- NANOG botch Jay R. Ashworth (Mar 17)
- Re: NANOG botch John Hensley (Mar 17)
- Re: NANOG botch Steven J. Sobol (Mar 18)
- Re: The Return of RP Records? Jeff (Mar 14)
- Re: The Return of RP Records? Jared Mauch (Mar 14)