nanog mailing list archives

Re: SYN spoofing

From: Dan Hollis <goemon () sasami anime net>
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 1999 12:32:40 -0700 (PDT)


On Wed, 28 Jul 1999, Deepak Jain wrote:

While it is easy, it is not always practical because you often have 
customers who advertise thousands of prefixes.


Why would this have any impact on filtering rfc1918 and other invalid nets
like 127.0.0.0/8 and 255.255.255.255?

Or perhaps someone could explain a valid reason to route these addresses.

-Dan

Current thread:

Re: SYN spoofing, (continued)
- Re: SYN spoofing Dan Hollis (Jul 26)
  - Re: SYN spoofing John Fraizer (Jul 28)
    - Re: SYN spoofing Joe Shaw (Jul 28)
    - Re: SYN spoofing Daniel Senie (Jul 28)
    - Re: SYN spoofing Greg A. Woods (Jul 28)
    - Re: SYN spoofing Vijay Gill (Jul 28)
    - Re: SYN spoofing Wayne Bouchard (Jul 28)
    - Re: SYN spoofing Daniel Senie (Jul 28)
    - Re: SYN spoofing Forrest W. Christian (Jul 28)
    - Re: SYN spoofing Deepak Jain (Jul 28)
    - Re: SYN spoofing Dan Hollis (Jul 28)
    - Re: SYN spoofing batz (Jul 28)
    - Re: SYN spoofing Dan Hollis (Jul 28)
    - Re: SYN spoofing Jeremy Porter (Jul 28)
    - Re: SYN spoofing Dan Hollis (Jul 28)
    - Re: SYN spoofing Jeremy Porter (Jul 28)
    - Re: SYN spoofing Dan Hollis (Jul 28)
    - Re: SYN spoofing John Fraizer (Jul 30)
- Re: SYN spoofing Deepak Jain (Jul 28)