nanog mailing list archives
Re: Huge smurf attack
From: "Steven J. Sobol" <sjsobol () nacs net>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 18:34:30 -0500
On Tue, Jan 12, 1999 at 05:37:17AM -0800, Michael Dillon wrote:
Much as I hate to say it, this seems to be one area where industry self-regulation has utterly failed. I don't know what would be a better solution; I hate to suggest government regulation. But I'm at a loss here.Government regulation is clearly the solution. Then everyone would have networks as well-run as the U.S. military...
The problem, of course, at least where smurf amplifiers are concerned, is that many ISP's are *better* configured than the military. :) Who was it that said a day or two ago that a majority of smurf amplifiers are being run by military sites? -- Steve Sobol [sjsobol () nacs net] Part-time Support Droid [support () nacs net] NACS Spaminator [abuse () nacs net] Proud resident of Cleveland Heights, Ohio, the coolest place on earth. http://www.ClevelandHeights.com
Current thread:
- Re: Solution: Re: Huge smurf attack, (continued)
- Re: Solution: Re: Huge smurf attack Daniel Senie (Jan 11)
- Re: Solution: Re: Huge smurf attack Dan Hollis (Jan 11)
- Re: Solution: Re: Huge smurf attack Craig A. Huegen (Jan 12)
- Re: Solution: Re: Huge smurf attack Brandon Ross (Jan 11)
- Message not available
- Re: Solution: Re: Huge smurf attack Jay R. Ashworth (Jan 13)
- Re: Solution: Re: Huge smurf attack Jon Lewis (Jan 12)
- Re: Solution: Re: Huge smurf attack Steve Gibbard (Jan 12)
- Re: Solution: Re: Huge smurf attack Alex P. Rudnev (Jan 12)
- Re: Huge smurf attack Phil Howard (Jan 11)
- Re: Huge smurf attack Michael Dillon (Jan 12)
- Re: Huge smurf attack Steven J. Sobol (Jan 12)
- Message not available
- Re: Huge smurf attack Dalvenjah FoxFire (Jan 12)
- Re: Huge smurf attack Ray Everett-Church (Jan 12)
- Re: Huge smurf attack Brandon Ross (Jan 11)
- Re: Huge smurf attack Dalvenjah FoxFire (Jan 12)
- Message not available
- Re: Huge smurf attack Jay R. Ashworth (Jan 13)