nanog mailing list archives

Re: Solution: Re: Huge smurf attack


From: Dan Hollis <goemon () sasami anime net>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 20:23:44 -0800 (PST)

On Mon, 11 Jan 1999, Daniel Senie wrote:
Then we need to re-classify having an open broadcast amplifier as an
abuse.  If we can get upstreams and backbones to give a formal 30 day
notice, then start cutting lines ...
I think this could easily be classified as abuse or abuse through
negligence (reckless endangerment?). Provider contracts should specify
that downstreams must deal with ingress filtering and must ensure their
networks will not respond to directed broadcasts from outside.

Speaking of negligence, I am disappointed at the backbones who continue to
route rfc1918 addresses, and wacko addresses like 0.0.0.0 and
255.255.255.255.

It is REALLY all that much to ask you guys to null0 route these networks?

Sheesh.

-Dan



Current thread: