nanog mailing list archives
Re: Solution: Re: Huge smurf attack
From: Dan Hollis <goemon () sasami anime net>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 13:04:16 -0800 (PST)
On Tue, 12 Jan 1999, Dean Anderson wrote:
At 12:39 PM 1/12/1999 -0800, Dan Hollis wrote:On Tue, 12 Jan 1999, Dean Anderson wrote:And yes, some customers may in fact want or need directed broadcasts on.Leaking rfc1918 onto the public internet is not acceptable, directed broadcasts enabled or not.Agreed. We block anything sourced from rfc1918 outbound, among other things.
Too bad the major backbones dont do this. Arent there something like "willfull negligence" laws somewhere when calculating monetary damages? Eg the backbones have been notified of the problem and outright refuse to take action to block rfc1918 addresses. -Dan
Current thread:
- Re: Solution: Re: Huge smurf attack, (continued)
- Re: Solution: Re: Huge smurf attack Dan Hollis (Jan 14)
- Re: Solution: Re: Huge smurf attack Brandon Ross (Jan 15)
- Re: Solution: Re: Huge smurf attack Phil Howard (Jan 15)
- Re: Solution: Re: Huge smurf attack Joe Shaw (Jan 14)
- Re: Solution: Re: Huge smurf attack Ray Everett-Church (Jan 14)
- Re: Solution: Re: Huge smurf attack Phil Howard (Jan 14)
- Re: Solution: Re: Huge smurf attack Daniel Senie (Jan 14)
- Re: Solution: Re: Huge smurf attack Phil Howard (Jan 14)
- Re: Solution: Re: Huge smurf attack Robbie Honerkamp (Jan 14)
- Re: Solution: Re: Huge smurf attack Dan Hollis (Jan 12)
- Re: Solution: Re: Huge smurf attack Brandon Ross (Jan 12)
- Re: Solution: Re: Huge smurf attack Brett Frankenberger (Jan 13)
- Re: Solution: Re: Huge smurf attack Daniel Senie (Jan 13)
- Re: Solution: Re: Huge smurf attack Brandon Ross (Jan 14)
- Re: Solution: Re: Huge smurf attack Steven J. Sobol (Jan 16)
- Re: Solution: Re: Huge smurf attack Steven J. Sobol (Jan 16)
- Re: Solution: Re: Huge smurf attack Alex P. Rudnev (Jan 16)