nanog mailing list archives
Re: Monitoring, Flow Stats (Re: spam whore, norcal-systems)
From: Phil Howard <phil () whistler intur net>
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 1999 10:46:08 -0600 (CST)
Dean Anderson wrote:
In this case, it says at the the end that service providers "shall not utilize service observing or random monitoring except for mechanical or service quality control checks"
Dropping spam on the floor is a "service quality control check". If it can be made mechanical (as opposed to hiring a staff of hundreds to read each incoming message to determine if it is spam or not) then it would fit under this description. -- -- *-----------------------------* Phil Howard KA9WGN * -- -- | Inturnet, Inc. | Director of Internet Services | -- -- | Business Internet Solutions | eng at intur.net | -- -- *-----------------------------* phil at intur.net * --
Current thread:
- Re: Monitoring, Flow Stats (Re: spam whore, norcal-systems) Dean Anderson (Feb 02)
- Re: Monitoring, Flow Stats (Re: spam whore, norcal-systems) Rich Sena (Feb 03)
- Re: Monitoring, Flow Stats (Re: spam whore, norcal-systems) Christopher Neill (Feb 03)
- Re: Monitoring, Flow Stats (Re: spam whore, norcal-systems) Michael Dillon (Feb 03)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Monitoring, Flow Stats (Re: spam whore, norcal-systems) Dean Anderson (Feb 02)
- Re: Monitoring, Flow Stats (Re: spam whore, norcal-systems) Phil Howard (Feb 03)
- Re: Monitoring, Flow Stats (Re: spam whore, norcal-systems) Christopher Neill (Feb 03)
- Message not available
- Digital Bill of Rights? (Re: Monitoring, Flow Stats) Christopher Neill (Feb 03)
- Re: Digital Bill of Rights? (Re: Monitoring, Flow Stats) Dean Robb (Feb 03)
- Re: Digital Bill of Rights? (Re: Monitoring, Flow Stats) Edward S. Marshall (Feb 04)
- Re: Monitoring, Flow Stats (Re: spam whore, norcal-systems) Jim Dixon (Feb 03)
- Re: Monitoring, Flow Stats (Re: spam whore, norcal-systems) Christopher Neill (Feb 03)