nanog mailing list archives
Re: Silly season
From: woods () most weird com (Greg A. Woods)
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 1999 14:28:24 -0500 (EST)
[ On Wednesday, December 22, 1999 at 23:58:21 (-0500), Andrew Brown wrote: ]
Subject: Re: Silly season it would be better, imho, to go to a 64 bit signed time_t, but that would be a major flag day.
"would be"!?!?! :-)
No, it *WILL* be an important day, but it will happen on a per-system
basis (and perhaps per-protocol basis if indeed there are any network
protocols carrying time_t or similar values).
--
Greg A. Woods
+1 416 218-0098 VE3TCP <gwoods () acm org> <robohack!woods>
Planix, Inc. <woods () planix com>; Secrets of the Weird <woods () weird com>
Current thread:
- Silly season Sean Donelan (Dec 22)
- Re: Silly season Alex P. Rudnev (Dec 22)
- Re: Silly season Richard Steenbergen (Dec 22)
- Message not available
- Re: Silly season Richard Steenbergen (Dec 22)
- Re: Silly season Andrew Brown (Dec 22)
- Re: Silly season Greg A. Woods (Dec 23)
- RE: Silly season Roeland M.J. Meyer (Dec 23)
- RE: Silly season Alex P. Rudnev (Dec 23)
- Re: Silly season Steve Dispensa (Dec 23)
- Re: Silly season Ehud Gavron (Dec 23)
- Re: Silly season Andrew Brown (Dec 23)
- Re: Silly season Deepak Jain (Dec 23)
- Re: Silly season Richard Steenbergen (Dec 22)
- Re: Silly season Tim Wolfe (Dec 23)
- Re: Silly season Richard Steenbergen (Dec 23)
- Re: Silly season Alex P. Rudnev (Dec 22)
- Re: Silly season Andrew Brown (Dec 23)
- Re: Silly season Alex P. Rudnev (Dec 23)