nanog mailing list archives
Re: Large-datagram hop-by-hop delivery mechanism
From: Steve Uurtamo <uurtamo () AZStarNet com>
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 1999 13:19:25 -0700 (MST)
This system is called UUCP :) --vadim
to the original poster: as much as people like to laugh about UUCP, it still works. UUCP over TCP/IP should do the trick. why not? if you expect that it is often likely that there will be _no_ routed path between source and destination hosts, and that queue-next-closest-available is what you want, i'd say UUCP is exactly your solution. smtp has way too much of what you don't need. steve.
Current thread:
- Large-datagram hop-by-hop delivery mechanism Mark R. Lindsey (Aug 04)
- Re: Large-datagram hop-by-hop delivery mechanism Andrew Brown (Aug 04)
- Re: Large-datagram hop-by-hop delivery mechanism Andrew Bangs (Aug 04)
- Re: Large-datagram hop-by-hop delivery mechanism Faust (Aug 04)
- Re: Large-datagram hop-by-hop delivery mechanism Edward S. Marshall (Aug 04)
- Re: Large-datagram hop-by-hop delivery mechanism Forrest W. Christian (Aug 05)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Large-datagram hop-by-hop delivery mechanism Mohler, Jeff (Aug 04)
- Re: Large-datagram hop-by-hop delivery mechanism Sean Donelan (Aug 04)
- Re: Large-datagram hop-by-hop delivery mechanism Vadim Antonov (Aug 04)
- Re: Large-datagram hop-by-hop delivery mechanism Steve Uurtamo (Aug 04)
- Re: Large-datagram hop-by-hop delivery mechanism Peter Galbavy (Aug 05)
- Re: Large-datagram hop-by-hop delivery mechanism Steve Uurtamo (Aug 04)
- Re: Large-datagram hop-by-hop delivery mechanism Mark R. Lindsey (Aug 04)
- Re: Large-datagram hop-by-hop delivery mechanism Andrew Brown (Aug 04)