nanog mailing list archives
in-addr.arpa question
From: Hank Nussbacher <hank () ibm net il>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 10:32:09 +0200
I have a client who is now peering with BBN. BBN supplied a /30 as follows: 207.112.240.113 is their side via a company they purchased called Nap.Net. The DNS shows: NChicago2-core0.nap.net Thats ok. The other side is the customer colo router and the IP of 207.112.240.114 shows: chi2-vts.ianet.net Now I claim that the domain ianet.net (based on Internic data) is some company in WV and has nothing to do with us (ianet is the customer name we were assigned by BBN). BBN claims that is this their "standard naming convention" for assigning customer interface names. Traceroutes will show up with ianet.net in the path. I claim this is in violation of some RFC. Am I wrong? There may be many such PTR records within BBN for "customername.net". Thanks, Hank
Current thread:
- in-addr.arpa question Hank Nussbacher (Aug 11)
- Re: in-addr.arpa question Ehud Gavron (Aug 11)
- Re: in-addr.arpa question Randy Bush (Aug 11)
- Re: in-addr.arpa question Mr. James W. Laferriere (Aug 11)
- Re: in-addr.arpa question Randy Bush (Aug 11)
- Re: in-addr.arpa question Ehud Gavron (Aug 11)