nanog mailing list archives

Re: Acceptable Use, WAS: Re: OUTAGE: MCI/Worldcom frame-relay , network


From: Mike Heller <mikeh () earthweb com>
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 1999 08:36:17 -0400 (EDT)


From the Nanog website:
".....Establish a forum for the exchange of technical information"

I agree that we should use restraint with posts like "my line is 
up" and "my line is down". This however, IS the place to discuss routers and 
switches and software pertinant to our everyday practices.
Don't get me wrong, I still love to find out that a provider of mine is 
having trouble on the west coast long before their call center has gotten 
word of it. 

mike

Michael Heller
Sr. Systems Engineer
Earthweb, Inc.
212.448.4175
mikeh () earthweb com

On Mon, 9 Aug 1999, Forrest W. Christian wrote:


  I do not believe NANOG is appropriate for real time operational
  issues.

Let me see here ....  What Can we not do on nanog:

We can't talk about cisco configuration issues as they are discussed
on cisco-nsp or something like that.

We can't talk about Routing Protocols - they belong on some other list
somewhere.

We can not talk about outages affecting most all of our customers - as
this isn't the appropriate forum.

I could go on and on and on....

Is there ANY topic which is ok to discuss on the nanog list?


- Forrest W. Christian (forrestc () imach com) KD7EHZ
----------------------------------------------------------------------
iMach, Ltd., P.O. Box 5749, Helena, MT 59604      http://www.imach.com
Solutions for your high-tech problems.                  (406)-442-6648
----------------------------------------------------------------------







Current thread: