nanog mailing list archives
Re: address spoofing
From: Andrew Brown <twofsonet () graffiti com>
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 1999 19:29:21 -0400
Furthermore, whether the RFC [1918] says so or not, I'm going to block these packets at *my* border routers, because:Curious as to the cost (added latency) in doing RFC 1918 source address filtering on all packets in the context of cost-benfit analysis.
on a router that's not doing filtering, it's going to be a small hit. i'm going to infer, however, that any router that's not doing filtering is probably not doing much traffic. and any router that is doing a lot of traffic, is already doing filtering. so it's less of a hit. -- |-----< "CODE WARRIOR" >-----| codewarrior () daemon org * "ah! i see you have the internet twofsonet () graffiti com (Andrew Brown) that goes *ping*!" andrew () crossbar com * "information is power -- share the wealth."
Current thread:
- Re: address spoofing, (continued)
- Re: address spoofing John Leong (Apr 23)
- Re: address spoofing Simon Leinen (Apr 27)
- Re: address spoofing Daniel Senie (Apr 22)
- Re: address spoofing Forrest W. Christian (Apr 23)
- Re: address spoofing Andrew Brown (Apr 23)
- Re: address spoofing Forrest W. Christian (Apr 23)
- Re: address spoofing sthaug (Apr 23)
- Re: address spoofing John Leong (Apr 23)
- Re: address spoofing Daniel Senie (Apr 23)
- Re: address spoofing bmanning (Apr 23)
- Re: address spoofing Andrew Brown (Apr 23)
- Re: address spoofing Randy Bush (Apr 23)
- Re: address spoofing Dan Hollis (Apr 23)
- Re: address spoofing sthaug (Apr 23)
- Re: address spoofing Greg A. Woods (Apr 23)
- Re: address spoofing Phil Howard (Apr 22)
- Re: address spoofing Greg A. Woods (Apr 23)
- Re: address spoofing Phillip Vandry (Apr 23)
- Re: address spoofing Greg A. Woods (Apr 23)
- Re: address spoofing Phil Howard (Apr 23)