nanog mailing list archives

Re: address spoofing


From: Andrew Brown <twofsonet () graffiti com>
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 1999 19:29:21 -0400


Furthermore, whether the RFC [1918] says so or not, I'm going to block
these packets at *my* border routers, because:

Curious as to the cost (added latency) in doing RFC 1918 source address
filtering on all packets in the context of cost-benfit analysis.

on a router that's not doing filtering, it's going to be a small hit.
i'm going to infer, however, that any router that's not doing
filtering is probably not doing much traffic.  and any router that is
doing a lot of traffic, is already doing filtering.  so it's less of a
hit.

-- 
|-----< "CODE WARRIOR" >-----|
codewarrior () daemon org             * "ah!  i see you have the internet
twofsonet () graffiti com (Andrew Brown)                that goes *ping*!"
andrew () crossbar com       * "information is power -- share the wealth."



Current thread: