nanog mailing list archives
Re: address spoofing
From: woods () most weird com (Greg A. Woods)
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 1999 16:09:05 -0400 (EDT)
[ On Friday, April 23, 1999 at 14:08:55 (-0400), Phillip Vandry wrote: ]
Subject: Re: address spoofing ...and I'd certainly like to see my ICMP unreachables which are vital to path MTU discovery not blocked.
That'll actually only happen if the router that needs to fragment also
uses RFC1918 addresses on one or more of its ports -- which would be a
totally brain-damaged configuration, to say the least.
--
Greg A. Woods
+1 416 218-0098 VE3TCP <gwoods () acm org> <robohack!woods>
Planix, Inc. <woods () planix com>; Secrets of the Weird <woods () weird com>
Current thread:
- Re: address spoofing, (continued)
- Re: address spoofing bmanning (Apr 23)
- Re: address spoofing Andrew Brown (Apr 23)
- Re: address spoofing Randy Bush (Apr 23)
- Re: address spoofing Dan Hollis (Apr 23)
- Re: address spoofing sthaug (Apr 23)
- Re: address spoofing Greg A. Woods (Apr 23)
- Re: address spoofing Phil Howard (Apr 22)
- Re: address spoofing Greg A. Woods (Apr 23)
- Re: address spoofing Phillip Vandry (Apr 23)
- Re: address spoofing Greg A. Woods (Apr 23)
- Re: address spoofing Phil Howard (Apr 23)
- Re: address spoofing Bryan Bradsby (Apr 23)
- Re: address spoofing Phil Howard (Apr 23)
- Re: address spoofing Andrew Brown (Apr 23)
- Re: address spoofing Phil Howard (Apr 25)
- Re: address spoofing sthaug (Apr 25)
- Re: address spoofing Andrew Brown (Apr 25)
- RE: address spoofing Roeland M.J. Meyer (Apr 26)