nanog mailing list archives
Re: Your class 'B' address space
From: Michael Dillon <michael () memra com>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1998 10:08:34 -0700 (PDT)
On Mon, 28 Sep 1998, John Todd wrote:
I think the number of sites that have this particular situation is very small and does not justify such an enormous waste of address space to circumvent the filters on these particular providers. Small address advertisements (>/19) are sufficient to provide acceptable redundancy in a multi-homed environment.
If the registries would start allocating address space that has been recovered from the swamp to this sort of company, then the problem would be solved. If a company needs multihoming capability but will never use more than a /23 then what is wrong with reusing swamp space? -- Michael Dillon - E-mail: michael () memra com Check the website for my Internet World articles - http://www.memra.com
Current thread:
- Your class 'B' address space Mark Vickers (Sep 28)
- Re: Your class 'B' address space John Todd (Sep 28)
- Re: Your class 'B' address space Austin Schutz (Sep 28)
- Re: Your class 'B' address space David R. Conrad (Sep 28)
- Re: Your class 'B' address space Austin Schutz (Sep 29)
- Re: Your class 'B' address space Jeremy Porter (Sep 29)
- Re: Your class 'B' address space Austin Schutz (Sep 28)
- Re: Your class 'B' address space John Todd (Sep 28)
- Re: Your class 'B' address space Michael Dillon (Sep 29)
- Re: Your class 'B' address space bmanning (Sep 30)