nanog mailing list archives
Re: .cc domain spam
From: Aaron Goldblatt <aglists () goldblatt net>
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 1998 09:40:42 -0500
This may be a stretch, but isn't there a law prohibiting taking advantage of a monopoly (registration services for .com, .net, .org, .edu) to help in the entry into a new market (forcing domain changes to domains registered through worldnic to be changed via worldnic, when this is not required for any other middleman/domain registration/hosting services)?
In the United States, it's called "restraint of trade." ag
Current thread:
- .cc domain spam Jon Lewis (Sep 25)
- Re: .cc domain spam Dalvenjah FoxFire (Sep 25)
- Re: .cc domain spam Michael Dillon (Sep 26)
- Re: .cc domain spam Jon Lewis (Sep 26)
- Re: .cc domain spam Sam Hayes Merritt, III (Sep 26)
- Re: .cc domain spam Jon Lewis (Sep 26)
- Re: .cc domain spam Patrick Greenwell (Sep 26)
- Re: .cc domain spam Jon Lewis (Sep 26)
- Re: .cc domain spam Aaron Goldblatt (Sep 28)
- Re: .cc domain spam Jon Lewis (Sep 28)
- Re: .cc domain spam Michael Dillon (Sep 26)
- Re: .cc domain spam Nanog Maillist (Sep 29)
- Re: .cc domain spam Patrick Greenwell (Sep 30)
- Re: .cc domain spam Nanog Maillist (Sep 30)
- Re: .cc domain spam Dalvenjah FoxFire (Sep 25)
- Message not available
- Re: .cc domain spam Jay R. Ashworth (Sep 27)
- Re: .cc domain spam Greg A. Woods (Sep 26)
- Re: .cc domain spam Deepak Jain (Sep 28)