nanog mailing list archives

Re: Maybe I'm misreading this but...


From: Patrick Greenwell <patrick () namesecure com>
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 1998 07:36:58 -0700 (PDT)

On 17 Oct 1998, Michael Shields wrote:

In article <4.0.1.19981016224901.00de6240 () pariah cncx com>,
I Am Not An Isp <patrick () ianai net> wrote:
FACT: RFC1918 space does not break PMTU discovery.  Deal with it.

If you use RFC 1918 space on the Internet, PMTU very well may not work
for you.  You can place fault on whatever standard you like but that
doesn't change the *operational* issue.

1) There is nothing inherient in the use of RFC 1918 space that will break
   PMTU.

2) In the real world, many providers filter RFC 1918 space, which has 
   a good chance of breaking PMTU.

There, everyone is right. Can we all put our genitalia away and move on?

/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
Patrick Greenwell                                        (800) 299-1288 v
                                    CTO                  (925) 377-1212 v
                                 NameSecure              (925) 377-1414 f    
Coming to the ISPF?     The Forum for ISPs by ISPs       http://www.ispf.com
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/




Current thread: