nanog mailing list archives
Re: Maybe I'm misreading this but...
From: Phillip Vandry <vandry () Mlink NET>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1998 18:05:14 -0400 (EDT)
If they really don't want to use up valid addresses for the point-to-point links, why not just run the interfaces unnumbered instead?
Well, of course it is useful in a traceroute to see clearly which interface same in through, which you can't tell with unnumbered. I expect that most of the people who do use RFC1918 addresses on their point to point links also resolve those addresses to names on their internal DNS servers to provide an even nicer and easier to debug traceroute. -Phil
Current thread:
- Re: Maybe I'm misreading this but..., (continued)
- Re: Maybe I'm misreading this but... Dean Anderson (Oct 14)
- Re: Maybe I'm misreading this but... Tim Wolfe (Oct 14)
- RE: Maybe I'm misreading this but... Martin, Christian (Oct 14)
- Re: Maybe I'm misreading this but... Dean Anderson (Oct 16)
- Re: Maybe I'm misreading this but... I Am Not An Isp (Oct 16)
- Re: Maybe I'm misreading this but... Jim Shankland (Oct 16)
- Re: Maybe I'm misreading this but... I Am Not An Isp (Oct 16)
- Re: Maybe I'm misreading this but... Dean Anderson (Oct 16)
- Re: Maybe I'm misreading this but... Phillip Vandry (Oct 16)
- Re: Maybe I'm misreading this but... I Am Not An Isp (Oct 16)
- Re: Maybe I'm misreading this but... John A. Tamplin (Oct 16)
- Re: Maybe I'm misreading this but... Phillip Vandry (Oct 16)
- Message not available
- Re: Maybe I'm misreading this but... I Am Not An Isp (Oct 16)
- Re: Maybe I'm misreading this but... Michael Shields (Oct 16)
- Re: Maybe I'm misreading this but... Dean Anderson (Oct 14)
- Re: Maybe I'm misreading this but... Darrell Fuhriman (Oct 19)