nanog mailing list archives

Re: Maybe I'm misreading this but...


From: I Am Not An Isp <patrick () ianai net>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1998 14:07:56 -0700

At 04:58 PM 10/16/98 -0400, tvo wrote:
Well, that is all fine and well if the device with the RFC1918 address is
the one screaming "Too Boocoo!" but if it's some other box trying to tell
it that the packets are too bug, no dice.  Non-routable address.

If you mean "if some device tries to tell the RFC1918 box the packet is too
large", this is correct.  However, the same reasoning shows that *ANY*
session opened between an RFC1918 box and a random host on the Internet
will break as well.

I suppose you could be talking about a one-way transmission of data from
the RFC1918 box to a random host.  If so, yes, you are SOL.  I just don't
see a whole lot of that. ;)

TTFN,
patrick

I Am Not An Isp
www.ianai.net
"Think of it as evolution in action." - Niven & Pournelle


Current thread: