nanog mailing list archives
Re: Discussion point: Telco quality?
From: Paul Ferguson <ferguson () cisco com>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1998 00:25:19 -0400
At 01:03 AM 10/11/98 -0700, Geoff Lisk wrote:
I can only hope that the current trend of realistic SLAs makes it to the carriers, instead of the current "well if it's down for a couple of days _maybe_ we'll refund some money to you if you beat us up really bad."
But that *is* the current SLA trend, and has been for years. - paul
Current thread:
- Re: Discussion point: Telco quality?, (continued)
- Re: Discussion point: Telco quality? Paul Ferguson (Oct 08)
- Re: Discussion point: Telco quality? David Lesher (Oct 08)
- Re: Discussion point: Telco quality? Paul Ferguson (Oct 08)
- Re: Discussion point: Telco quality? Paul Ferguson (Oct 08)
- Re: Discussion point: Telco quality? Roeland M.J. Meyer (Oct 08)
- RE: Discussion point: Telco quality? Bill St. Arnaud (Oct 09)
- RE: Discussion point: Telco quality? Paul Ferguson (Oct 09)
- RE: Discussion point: Telco quality? Bill St. Arnaud (Oct 09)
- RE: Discussion point: Telco quality? Paul Ferguson (Oct 09)
- RE: Discussion point: Telco quality? Roeland M.J. Meyer (Oct 09)
- RE: Discussion point: Telco quality? Paul Ferguson (Oct 09)
- Re: Discussion point: Telco quality? Paul Ferguson (Oct 11)
- Re: Discussion point: Telco quality? Dan Hollis (Oct 11)
- Re: Discussion point: Telco quality? Chris Kilbourn (Oct 12)
- Re: Discussion point: Telco quality? David Lesher (Oct 10)
- Re: Discussion point: Telco quality? Roeland M.J. Meyer (Oct 10)
- Re: Discussion point: Telco quality? David Lesher (Oct 10)
- Re: Discussion point: Telco quality? Randy Bush (Oct 10)
- Message not available
- Re: Discussion point: Telco quality? Jay R. Ashworth (Oct 11)