nanog mailing list archives
Re: NOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!! (Was Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed?
From: Rich Sena <ras () poppa clubrich tiac net>
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 1998 12:10:08 -0400 (EDT)
On Sat, 10 Oct 1998, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
Please... this is dead; let's let it stay that way,
Fu ckrying out loud - I was behind a few hundred noises - hell everyone else got to piss all over NANOG - damn I get a Mr. Bill for my troubles... -- I am nothing if not net-Q! - ras () poppa clubrich tiac net
Current thread:
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed?, (continued)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Barry Shein (Oct 01)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Barry Shein (Oct 01)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? D'Arcy J.M. Cain (Oct 01)
- Message not available
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Jay R. Ashworth (Oct 01)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? jprovo (Oct 01)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Mikolaj J. Habryn (Oct 01)
- Message not available
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Jay R. Ashworth (Oct 01)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- NOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!! (Was Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Jay R. Ashworth (Oct 10)
- Re: NOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!! (Was Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Rich Sena (Oct 10)