nanog mailing list archives

Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed?

From: Tom Pinard <tomp () ans net>
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 1998 10:50:27 -0400 (EDT)

On Fri, 2 Oct 1998, Dean Anderson wrote:

We now return you to TongaV8, in progress..
                     ^^^^^^^
Karl


Whats this mean??

              --Dean


I think that is in reference to the IPv8 discussion....

TomP

Current thread:

Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed?, (continued)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Roeland M.J. Meyer (Oct 01)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Barry Shein (Oct 01)
  - Change begins with the self (was Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed?) J.D. Falk (Oct 01)
  - Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Aaron Goldblatt (Oct 01)
    - Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Barry Shein (Oct 01)
  - Who makes policy?, was (Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely , rogue and should be removed?) Chris Kilbourn (Oct 01)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Peter Stemwedel (Oct 01)
  - Message not available
    - Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Jay R. Ashworth (Oct 01)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Dean Anderson (Oct 01)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Dean Anderson (Oct 02)
  - Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Tom Pinard (Oct 02)