nanog mailing list archives
Re: Xedia vs Packeteer Comparsion
From: bcurnow <bcurnow () sonnet com>
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 1998 09:25:16 -0800 (PST)
I'm doing such a comparison right now.. Here are the things I am concerned about: Xedia: Does T3/ATM interfaces and routes Packeteer: Bridge Ethernet only. Xedia: 600 individual profiles Packeteer: 4096 (I think, double checking that with them) Xedia: Doesn't need two routers Packeteer: Since it only bridges, it has to be between two intelligent devices. I don't think looping it out and back to the same Cisco would work. Since I need more profiles, I am leaning toward a Packeteer. If anyone else has notes, I would like to hear them. ----------------- Brian Curnow ---------------- On Fri, 30 Oct 1998, Michael Gibson wrote:
I wonder if anybody one there has had experience with both xedia and packeteer and would let me know what the strengths and weaknesses was of each Michael Gibson Team Leader, Network Operations - Netcom Canada Telephone: 416-341-5751 Fax: 416-341-5725 magibson () netcom ca
Current thread:
- Xedia vs Packeteer Comparsion Michael Gibson (Oct 30)
- Re: Xedia vs Packeteer Comparsion bcurnow (Oct 30)
- Re: Xedia vs Packeteer Comparsion bcurnow (Oct 30)
- Re: Xedia vs Packeteer Comparsion Jeff Mcadams (Oct 30)
- Re: Xedia vs Packeteer Comparsion matthew zeier (Oct 30)
- Re: Xedia vs Packeteer Comparsion Christofer Hoff (Oct 30)
- Re: Xedia vs Packeteer Comparsion bcurnow (Oct 30)
- Re: Xedia vs Packeteer Comparsion bcurnow (Oct 30)