nanog mailing list archives
Re: time for a new list?
From: Jared Mauch <jared () puck nether net>
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 1998 20:09:06 -0500
On Tue, Nov 03, 1998 at 08:00:13PM -0500, Andrea Di Lecce wrote:
At 00:12 11/3/98 -0500, you wrote:I have been reading this list for a while now, and for the most part, just sitting back reading posts that interest me. I appreciate the early heads up on outages, new info on networking technology and the like. However, I do believe that moderating or "policing" the list would be a good idea.Instead of a pure moderation, where every post must be approved either manually or by sender, why not have a few people who are well-versed on the FAQ, gently reminding those that step too far away from it ? Suspension of posting privileges can be an option, if absolutely necessary.
Folks at Merit already sorta do this. I've gotten loving e-mail from them saying my postings are not always on topic, or that cross posting is bad. - Jared
Current thread:
- Re: time for a new list?, (continued)
- Re: time for a new list? Richard Irving (Nov 09)
- Message not available
- Re: time for a new list? Dave Crocker (Nov 03)
- RE: time for a new list? Chad Skidmore (Nov 02)
- RE: time for a new list? Forrest W. Christian (Nov 02)
- Re: time for a new list? Steven J. Sobol (Nov 03)
- Re: time for a new list? bmanning (Nov 04)
- Re: time for a new list? alex (Nov 04)
- RE: time for a new list? Forrest W. Christian (Nov 02)
- Re: time for a new list? Peter Polasek (Nov 03)
- Re: time for a new list? Andrea Di Lecce (Nov 03)
- Re: time for a new list? Jared Mauch (Nov 03)
- RE: time for a new list? scott w (Nov 09)