nanog mailing list archives
Re: Exodus Customer Security
From: Bret McDanel <bret () rehost com>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1998 13:21:44 -0500
---Reply on mail from David Lesher about Exodus Customer Security
Unnamed Administration sources reported that Bret McDanel said:If you make a policy where you dont give out customer information, when do you break that policy? After 2 complaints? 5? Whatever the number, there is always someone out there who can and will abuse that, for whatever reason..Don't need to. Offer to set up a three-way call. Then {Sprint} and alleged victim can both talk to alleged source.
I dont know, i still think that may be somewhat intrusive to the customer of the ISP (and adds extra load onto the ISP).. If the 'victim' doesnt press criminal charges against the client, or doesnt bring forth a civil suit, then I dont see that the ISP need give up any information, nor do they need to play operator and 3-way everyone in.. Restricting access is a different matter however.. As they are to some degree responsible for what crosses their network (providing they have been made aware of it).. -- Bret McDanel http://www.rehost.com Realistic Technologies, Inc. 973-514-1144 These opinions are mine, and may not be the same as my employer
Current thread:
- Re: Unix trioyans and Customer Security, (continued)
- Re: Unix trioyans and Customer Security alex (Nov 18)
- Re: Unix trioyans and Customer Security Steve Noble (Nov 18)
- Re: Exodus Customer Security Bret McDanel (Nov 17)
- Re: Exodus Customer Security Alex P. Rudnev (Nov 18)
- Re: Exodus Customer Security Richard Irving (Nov 18)
- Re: Exodus Customer Security Adam Rothschild (Nov 18)
- Re: Exodus Customer Security Alex P. Rudnev (Nov 18)
- Re: Exodus Customer Security Steve Noble (Nov 18)
- Re: Exodus Customer Security Phil Howard (Nov 18)
- Re: Exodus Customer Security Alex P. Rudnev (Nov 18)
- Re: Exodus Customer Security Bret McDanel (Nov 18)