nanog mailing list archives
Re: Exodus Customer Security
From: Adam Rothschild <asr () millburn net>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1998 08:53:04 -0500 (EST)
On Wed, 18 Nov 1998, Richard Irving wrote:
Ask yourself this: Can you (as an NSP) guarantee me that *none* of your boxes, or *customer* boxes, have been infected ?
That's a bit extreme, and should not be expected of any NSP. All I want is, when such obvious and widespread abuse is coming from their (Exodus's) customers, they step in and do *something* (that something being contacting the customer, and severing connectivity if the problems do not cease in a reasonable amount of time), rather than just ignoring this entirely. Am I being too idealistic here? I guess this is more an issue of NSP policy/responsibility/expectations than of Exodus suckage...
Current thread:
- Re: What's wrong with Exodus?, (continued)
- Re: What's wrong with Exodus? Jon Green (Nov 17)
- Re: What's wrong with Exodus? Adam Rothschild (Nov 17)
- Re: What's wrong with Exodus? TTSG (Nov 18)
- Unix trioyans and Customer Security alex (Nov 17)
- Re: Unix troyans and Customer Security Henry Linneweh (Nov 17)
- Re: Unix trioyans and Customer Security alex (Nov 18)
- Re: Unix trioyans and Customer Security Steve Noble (Nov 18)
- Re: Exodus Customer Security Alex P. Rudnev (Nov 18)
- Re: Exodus Customer Security Richard Irving (Nov 18)
- Re: Exodus Customer Security Adam Rothschild (Nov 18)
- Re: Exodus Customer Security Alex P. Rudnev (Nov 18)
- Re: Exodus Customer Security Steve Noble (Nov 18)
- Re: Exodus Customer Security Phil Howard (Nov 18)
- Re: Exodus Customer Security Bret McDanel (Nov 18)