nanog mailing list archives
Re: Hold on to your news servers
From: "Scott Gifford" <sgifford () tir com>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1998 18:39:55 -0500
I think a lot of people hope you are reconsidering your plans to do this. It's a nice idea, and your motivation is good. It just won't work in practice. So, in my nicest and most appreciative tone, I would like to
ask
you on behalf of myself and many people who are also appreciative of your efforts and your motives to reconsider and abandon this plan.I'd be happy to abandon it if something that accomplishes the same job, or substantially the same job, shows up before it goes online.
Have you considered using NoCeM's to do this? This would be much more opt-in, as somebody would have to specifically configure NoCeM to accept your key. It is also much more efficient than cancels, at least propogation-wise. Just a thought from a news administrator who doesn't want to be processing 300,000+ cancels a day all of a sudden, -------Scott.
Current thread:
- Re: Hold on to your news servers, (continued)
- Re: Hold on to your news servers Henry Linneweh (Nov 15)
- RE: Hold on to your news servers Chris Mauritz (Nov 15)
- Re: Hold on to your news servers Dean Anderson (Nov 16)
- Re: Hold on to your news servers Karl Denninger (Nov 16)
- RE: Hold on to your news servers Chris Mauritz (Nov 16)
- Re: Hold on to your news servers Dean Anderson (Nov 16)
- Re: Hold on to your news servers Karl Denninger (Nov 16)
- RE: Hold on to your news servers Chris Mauritz (Nov 16)
- Re: Hold on to your news servers Karl Denninger (Nov 16)
- Re: Hold on to your news servers John Fraizer (Nov 16)
- Re: Hold on to your news servers Scott Gifford (Nov 16)