nanog mailing list archives
Re: was i asleep when the gtld servers had the worse problem today?
From: Paul A Vixie <paul () vix com>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1998 08:43:34 -0800
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1998 03:51:09 -0800 (PST) From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com> if i understand, f.root-servers.net was having problems doing an axfr from a.root-servers.net. has anyone determined a technical reason why?
for four days, tcpdump on my side shows behaviour consistent with lost ACKs; pathchar from my side shows that A's first mile is a lossy 3Mb/s bottleneck. i've switched F from axfr to ftp for now, and rz.internic.net is showing the same lossage. i'm sending a lot of duplicate ACKs. transfer is slow. 08:33:01.038694 198.41.0.19.20 > 204.152.184.251.3022: . 58236:59696(1460) ack 1 win 8760 (DF) [tos 0x8] 08:33:01.038984 204.152.184.251.3022 > 198.41.0.19.20: . ack 58236 win 33580 (DF) 08:33:01.039100 204.152.184.251.3022 > 198.41.0.19.20: . ack 62616 win 29200 (DF) 08:33:01.039176 204.152.184.251.3022 > 198.41.0.19.20: . ack 62616 win 33580 (DF)
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1998 13:21:36 +0100 From: Ray Davis <ray () carpe net> Aren't NSI's nameservers running bind? If not, then that's scary. If so, then why wouldn't they also become lame rather than insane?
they were having different problems. their operators had to restart named but that the zone file itself had transferred cleanly. they weren't lame. in other words, NSI's servers' problems were because of me (or: my code) and my server's problems were because of NSI (or: their transit pipe.) right now i'm looking at the code, and they're working on their link.
Current thread:
- Re: was i asleep when the gtld servers had the worse problem today?, (continued)
- Re: was i asleep when the gtld servers had the worse problem today? Steven J. Sobol (Nov 12)
- Re: was i asleep when the gtld servers had the worse problem today? Jared Mauch (Nov 12)
- Re: was i asleep when the gtld servers had the worse problem today? J.D. Falk (Nov 12)
- Re: was i asleep when the gtld servers had the worse problem today? Mathias Koerber (Nov 12)
- Re: was i asleep when the gtld servers had the worse problem today? J.D. Falk (Nov 12)
- Re: was i asleep when the gtld servers had the worse problem today? J.D. Falk (Nov 13)
- Re: was i asleep when the gtld servers had the worse problem today? Dean Robb (Nov 15)
- Re: was i asleep when the gtld servers had the worse problem today? Randy Bush (Nov 15)
- Re: was i asleep when the gtld servers had the worse problem today? Steven J. Sobol (Nov 12)
- Re: was i asleep when the gtld servers had the worse problem today? Paul Vixie (Nov 13)
- Re: was i asleep when the gtld servers had the worse problem today? Randy Bush (Nov 13)
- Re: was i asleep when the gtld servers had the worse problem today? Paul A Vixie (Nov 13)
- other network problems with hosts at internic.net (was: was i asleep when the gtld servers had the worse problem today? ) Greg A. Woods (Nov 13)
- RE: other network problems with hosts at internic.net (was: was i asleep when the gtld servers had the worse problem today? ) Thom Youngblood (Nov 13)
- Re: other network problems with hosts at internic.net (was: was i John Gonzalez/netMDC admin (Nov 13)
- Re: other network problems with hosts at internic.net (was: was i asleep when the gtld servers had the worse problem today? ) Marc Slemko (Nov 13)
- Re: other network problems with hosts at internic.net Greg A. Woods (Nov 14)
- Message not available
- Re: was i asleep when the gtld servers had the worse problem today? Jay R. Ashworth (Nov 14)
- Re: was i asleep when the gtld servers had the worse problem today? Steven J. Sobol (Nov 14)
- Re: was i asleep when the gtld servers had the worse problem today? Ray Davis (Nov 13)
- Re: was i asleep when the gtld servers had the worse problem today? Dean Robb (Nov 15)