nanog mailing list archives

Re: WCCP talk..


From: alex () nac net
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1998 23:16:03 -0500 (EST)

On Wed, 11 Nov 1998, lincoln dale wrote:

Your missing what I said. What if the cache continues sending WCCP
packets, but the cache itself has died?

i don't think i am --
i would assume that the cache design would perform suitable sanity checks
prior to sending out a heartbeat.  if the design is sound, the cache would
not be capable of sending out WCCP packets if it has 'died' in some way.

You can't be serious.

A cache may check itself, but my arguement is that this self-checking
scheme may fail, seeing itself as alive, but not able to actually serve
requests.




-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
     Atheism is a non-prophet organization. I route, therefore I am.
       Alex Rubenstein, alex () nac net, KC2BUO, ISP/C Charter Member
               Father of the Network and Head Bottle-Washer
     Net Access Corporation, 9 Mt. Pleasant Tpk., Denville, NJ 07834
 Don't choose a spineless ISP; we have more backbone!  http://www.nac.net
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --



Current thread: