nanog mailing list archives

Re: WCCP talk..


From: alex () nac net
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1998 23:05:00 -0500 (EST)

That I can accept.

But, I still have one fundamental argument, which is to ensure true and
absolute reliability, a machine should not be verifying its own health.

My other concern is that now that it is licensable, will the other cache
manufacturers do it properly also?



I haven't yet encountered a situation where the cache was having a problem
and yet was still responding and talking WCCP to the router.

When our Cache Engines have experienced problems, they have removed
themselves from the available pool or stopped responding to WCCP (which,
in turn, caused them to be removed).

In short, I believe there's a very strong mechanism to check all
functions of the cache before saying "hey, I'm okay here".

/cah


-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
     Atheism is a non-prophet organization. I route, therefore I am.
       Alex Rubenstein, alex () nac net, KC2BUO, ISP/C Charter Member
               Father of the Network and Head Bottle-Washer
     Net Access Corporation, 9 Mt. Pleasant Tpk., Denville, NJ 07834
 Don't choose a spineless ISP; we have more backbone!  http://www.nac.net
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --



Current thread: