nanog mailing list archives

Re: Core router bakeoff?


From: Karl Denninger <karl () mcs net>
Date: Thu, 7 May 1998 18:45:21 -0500

On Thu, May 07, 1998 at 05:33:03PM -0400, Perry E. Metzger wrote:

Gregory Mirsky writes:
Perry, may I ask why you exclude Bay and 3Com? Any particular bad
experience from the previous life?

I've only actually had bad experience with Bay stuff -- 3Com isn't
even in the running for the most part -- the software doesn't even
pretend to be able to do the job for a backbone.

And Rob, it you're building a backbone I'd add Ascend's GRF to the list.

Actually, I rather like the architecture of the GRF, though I must
admit to have never tried one out. I've heard some good things and
they might be worth a test or two.

Perry

Well, the GRF has its good and bad points.  I've tested one rather
extensively, although I admit it was some time (~8-9 months) ago.

--
-- 
Karl Denninger (karl () MCS Net)| MCSNet - Serving Chicagoland and Wisconsin
http://www.mcs.net/          | T1's from $600 monthly / All Lines K56Flex/DOV
                             | NEW! Corporate ISDN Prices dropped by up to 50%!
Voice: [+1 312 803-MCS1 x219]| EXCLUSIVE NEW FEATURE ON ALL PERSONAL ACCOUNTS
Fax:   [+1 312 803-4929]     | *SPAMBLOCK* Technology now included at no cost


Current thread: