nanog mailing list archives
Re: Core router bakeoff?
From: "Jason L. Weisberger" <jweis () softaware com>
Date: Thu, 7 May 1998 18:45:46 -0700 (PDT)
On Thu, 7 May 1998, Karl Denninger wrote:
Well, the GRF has its good and bad points. I've tested one rather extensively, although I admit it was some time (~8-9 months) ago.
I've been rather upset with Ascend over their lack of reaction to the bug in the Pipe 150 that had it publishing ARP statments for every ip address that went by its ethernet interface. Have you found their other products to be better supported and safer to fire and forget? jlw -- Jason Weisberger Chief Technology Officer SoftAware, Inc. - 310/305-0275 "Let us cross over the river, and rest under the shade of the trees." -Thomas Jonathan "Stonewall" Jackson
Current thread:
- Re: Core router bakeoff?, (continued)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Andrew Bangs (May 07)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Perry E. Metzger (May 07)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Robert Sanders (May 08)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Perry E. Metzger (May 08)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Neil J. McRae (May 08)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Joe Warren-Meeks (May 08)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Nathan Stratton (May 07)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Perry E. Metzger (May 07)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Karl Denninger (May 07)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Jason L. Weisberger (May 07)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Karl Denninger (May 07)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Steve Sobol (May 08)