nanog mailing list archives
Re: The Great Exchange
From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry () piermont com>
Date: Fri, 29 May 1998 14:07:50 -0400
Tim Pozar writes:
Perry E. Metzger wrote:Michael Shields writes:Despite preductions, very few resources have ever actually become "too cheap to meter".Television?I assume you are refering to over the air broadcast service. You pay for every kilowatt and employee salary by buying the products that advertise on the station.
Naturally. That is not the point, however. The point was that no one bothers to meter the service -- it is paid for in other ways. Anyway, this discussion has been taken way too far. Mr. Shields believes that distance based packet accounting is "fair" and that it is somehow going to happen. I believe that it is unlikely in the extreme. Time will tell which of us is right. Perry
Current thread:
- Re: The Great Exchange, (continued)
- Re: The Great Exchange John A. Tamplin (May 29)
- Re: The Great Exchange Perry E. Metzger (May 29)
- Re: The Great Exchange Miquel van Smoorenburg (May 29)
- Message not available
- Re: The Great Exchange Jay R. Ashworth (May 29)
- Re: The Great Exchange Vadim Antonov (May 29)
- Message not available
- Re: The Great Exchange Jay R. Ashworth (May 29)
- Re: The Great Exchange Michael Shields (May 29)
- Re: The Great Exchange Jerry Scharf (May 29)
- Re: The Great Exchange Vadim Antonov (May 29)
- Re: The Great Exchange Tim Pozar (May 29)
- Re: The Great Exchange Perry E. Metzger (May 29)
- Re: The Great Exchange Michael Shields (May 29)
- Message not available
- Re: The Great Exchange Jay R. Ashworth (May 29)
- Message not available
- Re: The Great Exchange Jay R. Ashworth (May 28)
- Re: The Great Exchange Michael Shields (May 29)
- Re: The Great Exchange Perry E. Metzger (May 29)
- Re: The Great Exchange Michael Shields (May 29)
- Message not available
- Re: The Great Exchange Jay R. Ashworth (May 29)
- Re: The Great Exchange Tom Perrine (May 27)