nanog mailing list archives

Re: Two renumbering questions


From: johnl () iecc com (John R. Levine)
Date: 5 May 1998 17:34:08 -0000

If it is a singleton hole in a /18, your most net-friendly action would
be to voluntarily renumber.  The provider's most net-friendly action
would be to indicate it was non-portable.

In case I didn't make it clear in my original question, I figured I'd
probably have to renumber -- I was more wondering if I had the option
to hold on to the old addresses for a little while during the
transition, since the overlap I'll get between the old and new
upstreams will (for a variety of reasons) probably not be very long.



-- 
John R. Levine, IECC, POB 727, Trumansburg NY 14886 +1 607 387 6869
johnl () iecc com, Village Trustee and Sewer Commissioner, http://iecc.com/johnl, 
Member, Provisional board, Coalition Against Unsolicited Commercial E-mail


Current thread: