nanog mailing list archives
Re: AT&T NOC?
From: michaels () sun aracnet com
Date: Sun, 10 May 1998 14:14:03 -0700 (PDT)
"Randy Bush" <randy () psg com> wrote:
This is not a NOC at all. This is a mailing list, read by quite a few network operators, many of whom are not impressed by would be operators who can not tell a mailing list from a NOC.
<snip> Give me a break. I think it's pretty obvious that he meant "is noc () att net, an address I've already tried to email, the correct address to reach the ATT NOC?" Were you just venting, or did you seriously misunderstand that? Mike --------------- "BOFH" <bb () zip com au> wrote
AT&T are currently advertising 61.8/20 for some reason but 61.8/19 is one of my networks. I need to contact them urgently as this is affecting about half of my customers. I'v fired of an email to noc () att net but havent got anything yet. Is this the correct address for their NOC or should I try elsewhere? -- Ben Buxton_____________________ o _ _--_|\ ZIP Internet P/L Zip Guy bb () zip com au /____|___|_)________/______\______________________ Voice: 9270-4777 | . \_.--._* Virtually Dial-in: 9247-7288, 9247-9144 Fax: 92475276 v the best :)
Current thread:
- AT&T NOC? BOFH (May 09)
- Re: AT&T NOC? Randy Bush (May 09)
- Message not available
- Re: AT&T NOC? Jay R. Ashworth (May 09)
- Re: AT&T NOC? michaels (May 11)
- Re: AT&T NOC? Scott Weeks (May 11)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: AT&T NOC? Brian Wilson (May 11)
- Re: AT&T NOC? Ben Buxton (May 11)