nanog mailing list archives

Re: Microsoft NOC?

From: "Justin W. Newton" <justin () gid net>
Date: Fri, 08 May 1998 17:02:21 -0700

At 07:52 AM 5/8/98 -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote:

The reason it is imperative that there be a telephone number for an
ISP is that it's really hard to use e-mail to contact an ISP if the
network connectivity to the ISP is not working.


Which will certainly be interesting when/if Voice Over IP happens.  Hmm,
whats next, network down, please use snail mail?

Justin W. Newton

Current thread:

Microsoft NOC? Kit Knox (May 07)
- Re: Microsoft NOC? Reid B. Fishler (May 07)
- Re: Microsoft NOC? Derek Balling (May 07)
  - Message not available
    - Re: Microsoft NOC? Jay R. Ashworth (May 08)
    - Re: Microsoft NOC? Gary E. Miller (May 08)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Microsoft NOC? Kurt Parent (May 07)
  - Re: Microsoft NOC? Kevin Oberman (May 08)
    - Re: Microsoft NOC? Robert Sanders (May 08)
    - Re: Microsoft NOC? Justin W. Newton (May 08)
    - Re: Microsoft NOC? Deepak Jain (May 11)
  - Message not available
    - Re: Microsoft NOC? Jay R. Ashworth (May 08)
- Re: Microsoft NOC? David P. Maynard (May 08)
- Re: Microsoft NOC? ""C. Philip Wood"" (May 08)