nanog mailing list archives
Re: Microsoft NOC?
From: Derek Balling <dredd () megacity org>
Date: Thu, 07 May 1998 17:47:47 -0500
At 03:36 PM 5/7/98 -0700, Kit Knox wrote:
425-882-8080 as listed by whois for Microsoft is not their NOC. When you call this number you are told that they will only transfer by a persons name or extension and offer no other assitance. If anyone has any other contact information it would be appreciated.
I suppose you could call InterNIC, advise them that the contact information for the domain MICROSOFT.COM is not valid, and that under InterNIC's stated policy the domain needs to be put "On Hold" until it is compliant with their regulations. Unless InterNIC is a Microsoft lapdog, too. *grin* Wonder if THAT would get their NOC's attention? Derek
Current thread:
- Microsoft NOC? Kit Knox (May 07)
- Re: Microsoft NOC? Reid B. Fishler (May 07)
- Re: Microsoft NOC? Derek Balling (May 07)
- Message not available
- Re: Microsoft NOC? Jay R. Ashworth (May 08)
- Re: Microsoft NOC? Gary E. Miller (May 08)
- Message not available
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Microsoft NOC? Kurt Parent (May 07)
- Re: Microsoft NOC? Kevin Oberman (May 08)
- Re: Microsoft NOC? Robert Sanders (May 08)
- Re: Microsoft NOC? Justin W. Newton (May 08)
- Re: Microsoft NOC? Deepak Jain (May 11)
- Re: Microsoft NOC? Kevin Oberman (May 08)
- Message not available
- Re: Microsoft NOC? Jay R. Ashworth (May 08)