nanog mailing list archives
Re: Core router bakeoff?
From: Tony Li <tli () juniper net>
Date: 08 May 1998 00:51:44 -0700
perry () piermont com (Perry E. Metzger) writes:
Yeah, but you'll have trouble getting decent T3 cards for it. Its true that 100Mbps ethernet should be fine.
SDL makes decent (tho not perfect) T3 cards for PCs.
BTW, NetBSD with the recent flow cache mods can handle at least 150,000 packets per second. We haven't seen what the actual upper limit is, but that number doesn't seem to be eating a lot of CPU.
Interesting. Have you done any scalability testing? Per-flow state has been shown to scale poorly in Internet backbones. Tony
Current thread:
- Core router bakeoff? Rob M VanHooren (May 07)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Perry E. Metzger (May 07)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Karl Denninger (May 07)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Perry E. Metzger (May 07)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Tony Li (May 08)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Paul Vixie (May 08)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Neil J. McRae (May 08)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Paul A Vixie (May 08)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Tony Li (May 08)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Karl Denninger (May 07)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Perry E. Metzger (May 08)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Tony Li (May 08)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Perry E. Metzger (May 07)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Michael H. Lambert (May 08)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Al Reuben (May 08)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Jason L. Weisberger (May 08)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Jason L. Weisberger (May 07)