nanog mailing list archives

Re: Someones being naughty again...


From: jlixfeld () idirect ca
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 1998 12:37:06 -0500 (EST)

No, you should definetly not be able to ping it.  Where are you in
respect to home.net?  If you are not directly connected to home.net and if
you can ping that IP, then @home is trying to advertise 10.0.184.0 to
their upstreams and they are accepting those advertisments.  If you are
on home.net then you will be able to see them.  That is definetly wrong
though!  I can see if you use 10.x net for un-advertised touch-down nets
between two routers, but you should definetly not be able to ping them
from afar.

On Sat, 14 Mar 1998, Marc Hurst wrote:

:Pinging ? [10.0.184.34] with 48 data bytes
:Statistics for 10.0.184.34
:12 packets transmitted, 6 packets received, 50% packet loss
:round-trip (ms) min/avg/max = 117/123/141
:
:This is wrong....
:
:I should not be able to do this!
:
:M.
:

--
Regards,  

Jason A. Lixfeld             jlixfeld () idirect ca
System Administrator [L5]    jlixfeld () torontointernetxchange net

---------------------------------------------------------------------
TUCOWS Interactive Ltd. o/a  | "A Different Kind of Internet Company"
Internet Direct Canada Inc.  | "FREE BANDWIDTH for Toronto Area IAPs"
5415 Dundas Street West      | http://www.torontointernetxchange.net
Suite 301, Toronto Ontario   | (416) 236-5806 ext 18 (T)
M9B-1B5 CANADA               | (416) 236-5804        (F)
---------------------------------------------------------------------



Current thread: