nanog mailing list archives

Re: Why does Sprint have address filters again?


From: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick () priori net>
Date: Mon, 01 Jun 1998 02:16:31 -0700

At 12:52 PM 5/31/98 -0700, Roeland M.J. Meyer wrote:

There is a definite business case for portable /21's. First off, I
understand the technical need to limit ASN's to /19's so I don't need
lecture #101. However, those limits were set quite some time ago. When can
we reduce them? Has technology stood still?

You understand "the technical need to limit ASN's to /19's"?  I don't,
perhaps you could explain it to me.  I have a whole bunch of multi-homed
downstreams who have /21s or /20s - with their own ASNs.  Should we just
give them more space?  Or are they "not allowed" to multi-home?  What am I
missing?

Roeland M.J. Meyer, ISOC (InterNIC RM993) 

TTFN,
patrick

**************************************************************
Patrick W. Gilmore                      voice: +1-650-482-2840
Director of Operations, CCIE #2983        fax: +1-650-482-2844
PRIORI NETWORKS, INC.                    http://www.priori.net
              "Tomorrow's Performance.... Today"
**************************************************************


Current thread: